|
Wrong!
|
-
English as a Second Language (ESL) program
should be the same for internationally adopted children
and children from immigrant families;
-
Bilingual education is beneficial for
adoptees;
-
International adoptees should be placed
in classrooms according to their age as it is routinely
done with other newcomers in a school district.
|
In reality, most of international
adoptees are not bilingual; bilingual education may not
be appropriate for them; ESL curriculum should be modified
for them. Their school placement depends on their actual
readiness to benefit from a certain level of instructions.
|
|
Wrong!
|
-
Any learning difficulties of international
adoptees are due to their detrimental past of social/cultural
deprivation and educational neglect. Therefore these children
need to experience "normal" life for some time
before any assessment for educational handicapping conditions
may take place.
-
International adoptees may not be eligible
for special education services because of language and
cultural issues involved.
|
In reality "wait-and-see"
position may lead to actual continuation of the same educational
neglect that former orphans had been exposed to in their
motherlands. We cannot afford to lose time in remediation
of these children; their learning needs may go well beyond
the issue of acculturation and new language acquisition.
|
|
Wrong!
|
- We cannot test these children because they do not know
enough English.
- We can use a community volunteer to act as a translator
for speech and language evaluation of a newly arrived child.
|
In reality there
are ways and means of assessing your child's educational
needs through his/her native language. That is what the
federal law stipulates.
To use a non-qualified personnel
in assessment (or assisting assessment) is a violation of
federal and state laws.
|